Standards-aware · ISO 15189 · WHO LQMS · SLIPTA

Quality that works for every lab.

Document control, corrective actions, and an AI assistant that only answers from your lab's own records — with the source shown, or a plain "not found" instead of a guess.

Early accessBuilding toward launch with a small first group of laboratories.
Accreditation readinessIllustrative sample

SOPs and policies current, versioned, and owned.

The reality

Your quality system already exists. It's just hiding.

In a shared drive. In a WhatsApp thread. In a folder only one person knows how to find. QualiTracker gives the work a home your whole lab can trust.

01

Find the record

Search quality documents, actions, and evidence from one place.

02

See the trail

Know what changed, who reviewed it, and what still needs attention.

03

Close the loop

Turn findings into assigned, visible actions with a clear next step.

04

Keep the context

Make your lab's own SOPs the source of truth for everyday questions.

Why it's different

Not a bigger binder. A different kind of system.

QualiTrackerShared drive / paperGeneric QMS software
TraceabilityEvery record traced, standard to verificationNo structured trace — tribal knowledgeVaries by vendor
AI answersCites its source, or says "not found"No AI assistantVaries by vendor
Built for these standardsISO 15189 · SLIPTA · WHO LQMSStandards knowledge lives in people's headsOften built for a different regulatory context
Data handlingPer-tenant isolation, self-hosted inferenceWhatever the drive's own access controls allowVaries by vendor
StatusEarly access — honestly stagedAlready what most labs useEstablished, but often not region-specific

See it, not just read about it

This is what your dashboard actually looks like.

Your labs, departments, roles, and people — scoped to who you are and where you work, the moment you log in.

Welcome back — dashboardIllustrative sample
4
Laboratories
11
Departments
6
Roles
23
Users in your lab

Your laboratory

LABORATORY
Central Reference Lab
LAB TYPE
Clinical
DEPARTMENT
Microbiology

The quality intelligence graph

Quality management isn't a pile of disconnected documents. It's a connected system.

A standard implies a document. A document describes a process. A process produces evidence. Evidence is what an audit checks — and what a finding, a non-conformance, or a CAPA all trace back to. Hover a node to follow the connection.

StandardDocumentAuditProcessFindingEvidenceNon-ConformanceCAPARiskPLANNEDVerification

Hover or focus a node to see how it connects.

The system

Two connected layers, one system of record.

Early access

QMS Module

A versioned document and record repository — SOPs, policies, quality records, and audit logs — for lab directors, quality managers, and accreditors.

Preview

QualiBOT

A conversational assistant grounded in your lab's own uploaded documents, for frontline technologists asking everyday questions in plain language — in English or Swahili.

Document & evidence intelligence

Every document moves through the same real workflow.

No status is invented for this page — these are the actual states a controlled document moves through, end to end.

A new SOP or policy starts here — editable, not yet in force.

Corrective action lifecycle

Two independent reviewers, not one rubber stamp.

Every finding is classified Major or Minor, auto-numbered, and closed only after two separate people have signed off — the same rigor an accreditor expects.

A finding is logged with a unique, auto-generated NC number and classified Major or Minor.

Ask the record

An assistant that knows when it doesn't know.

Ask in plain language. Get an answer grounded in your lab's own records, with the source beside it — and if there's no relevant record, QualiTracker says so rather than guessing.

Ask QualiTracker

Illustrative demo — not a real laboratory's data

What corrective actions remain unresolved from the most recent internal audit?

Two corrective actions are still open from the Q3 internal audit: CAPA-014 (reagent storage deviation, due in 4 days) and CAPA-017 (equipment calibration record gap, due in 11 days).

QUALIBOT / RESPONSE
SOURCE
Audit Log · Q3 2026
RETRIEVAL
ABOVE THRESHOLD
TRACE
AUDIT → FINDING → CAPA
HUMAN REVIEW
REQUIRED

AI-generated — verify critical decisions with your lab supervisor. Not a diagnostic tool.

Try the other state

Keep scrolling

That answer above didn't come from nowhere. Here's the path it walked.

How an answer gets built

1

Question

A staff member asks in plain language — no query syntax to learn.

2

Permission layer

Checked against what that person's role is allowed to see, first.

3

Authorized knowledge

Only this lab's own uploaded SOPs, records, and audit logs — never another lab's data.

4

Retrieval

The relevant passage is located, not guessed at.

5

Evidence

The exact document and section the answer will cite.

6

AI reasoning

A plain-language answer is drafted from the evidence, not from general knowledge.

7

Traceable response

Delivered with its citation and a confidence level attached — or a clear "not found."

Where we are, and where we're going

Quality-management software today. An institutional ambition for tomorrow.

Early accessCurrent product

Quality-management software

QualiTracker is a digital quality-management system: document control, records, audits, corrective actions, and an AI assistant grounded in a lab's own documents. It helps a laboratory organize and evidence its own quality work — it does not certify, audit on behalf of, or accredit anyone.

PlannedLong-term vision

Contributing to accreditation-readiness infrastructure

Longer term, we want to explore the institutional path toward supporting laboratory accreditation readiness across East Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa. That is a future ambition, contingent on obtaining the appropriate authorization — not a current capability, and not implied by anything else on this site.

Start the conversation

Let's make quality easier to see.

We're building toward launch with a small first group of laboratories. Join the waitlist, or talk to the team if you're evaluating for an institution or partnership.